When purchasing an hot stamping foil slitting machine, it is necessary to comprehensively consider many factors such as equipment performance, production demand and after-sales service. Here's a systematic guide to help you make an informed decision:
1. Slitting accuracy: core indicators
1. Accuracy class
◦ Ordinary slitting: ±0.1~0.2mm (suitable for conventional packaging and labeling)
◦ High-precision slitting: within ±0.05mm (high-end fields such as electronics and optical films)
Recommendation: Depending on the material application, precision should be prioritized for high value-added products.
2. Critical impact components
◦ Guiding system: Photoelectric/ultrasonic correction can adjust the deviation in real time, which is better than mechanical correction.
◦ Turret structure: The round knife driven by the servo motor is more stable than the pneumatic knife and is suitable for high-speed slitting.
◦ Tension control: Closed-loop tension systems (e.g., magnetic particle brake + sensor) reduce material tensile deformation.
2. Production efficiency: match the demand for production capacity
1. Slitting speed
◦ Medium and low speed models: 50~200m/min (small batch, multi-specification switching)
◦ High-speed model: 200~600m/min (large-scale continuous production)
Note: The speed increase needs to be matched with unwinding/winding capacity (such as shaft diameter above Φ600mm).
2. Automation features
◦ Automatic tool change, in-line inspection (defect/width) reduces downtime.
◦ The intelligent scheduling system is suitable for multi-order switching scenarios.
3. Material adaptability: avoid hidden costs
1. hot stamping foil characteristics
◦ Substrate type: PET/OPP/BOPP and other films need to correspond to different tension parameters.
◦ Coating resistance: Thermal coating equipment needs to be equipped with a low-temperature slitting mode.
2. Device Compatibility
◦ Check the maximum slitting width (600~2500mm) and thickness range (12~50μm).
◦ Multi-spindle winding is optional, suitable for special materials such as composite film.
Fourth, the quality of key components: durability comparison
parts | Low-configuration solution | High-configuration solution | suggestion |
cutting tool | Ordinary alloy steel | Tungsten carbide/ceramic coated knives | Choose the latter with high precision |
bearing | Domestic ordinary bearings | SKF/NSK brand bearings | High-speed machine is a must |
Control system | PLC basic version | Siemens/Mitsubishi + touch screen | Complex process selection of high configuration |
5. After-sales service: long-term operation guarantee
1. Response Timeliness
◦ Preferential choice of 24-hour online technical support + 48-hour on-site service suppliers.
◦ Confirm availability of spare parts (e.g., consumables such as blades, sensors, etc.).
2. Value-added services
◦ Free hands-on training (especially essential for novice teams).
◦ Annual maintenance contracts reduce the risk of sudden breakdowns.
6. Cost assessment: a full life cycle perspective
• Initial cost: The price of domestic equipment is about 1/3~1/2 of imported brands (such as 300,000 yuan for domestic brands vs 800,000 yuan for European brands).
• Long-term cost: calculate the difference in energy consumption (servo motor saves 20%~30% power compared with asynchronous motor) and the impact of scrap rate.
• Hidden costs: such as equipment upgrade costs, technical blockade risks (some imported equipment software needs to be unlocked at an additional cost).
7. Verification suggestions
1. Test requirements
◦ Test with your own materials, focusing on slitting edge burrs and rewinding uniformity.
◦ Simulate an emergency shutdown to see if the tension recovery is smooth.
2. Case study
◦ Suppliers are required to provide customer cases in the same industry and observe the operation status of equipment on the spot.
Summarize the decision-making process
1. Clarify your own product specifications and average daily production capacity requirements.
2. Screen 3~5 suppliers for parameter comparison and on-site verification.
3. Comprehensive score (recommended weight: accuracy 30% | stability 25% | service 20% | cost 25%).
Through systematic evaluation, procurement risks can be significantly reduced and equipment investment can be maximized.